|
| Part 1 - Guidance on selection of tests |
| Part 2 - Animal welfare requirements |
| Part 3 - Tests for genotoxicity, carcinoqenicity and reproductive toxicity |
| Part 4 - Selection of tests for interaction with blood |
| Part 5 - Tests for cytotoxicity in vitro methods |
| Part 6 - Teats for local effects after implantation |
| Part 7 - Ethylene oxide sterilisation residues |
| Part 8 - Clinical investigation (not part of EN30993) |
| Part 9 - Degradation materials related to biological testing |
| Part 10 - Tests for irritation and sensitisation |
| Part 11 - Tests for systemic toxicity |
| Part 12 - Sample preparation and Reference Materials (In preparation) |
| Part 13 - Identification and quantification of degradation products from polymers |
| Part 14 - Identification and quantification of degradation products from ceramics |
| Part 15 - Identification and quantification of degradation products from metals and alloys |
| Part 16 - 'Toxicokinetic study design for degradation product and leachables |
| Part 17 - Materials characterisation. |
Part 1 specifies the minimum requirements and rationale for a systematic approach to the biological evaluation of any medical device. It does not prescribe specific tests or acceptance criteria for or between tests. It is solely for guidance and considers:
In many ways therefore, it is the most important part of the series the, remaining parts providing evaluation. of the different important aspects of behaviour observed between both the implant material and surrounding tissue, and the tissue and the material.
Nonetheless despite these Standards, medical device evaluation remains complex. This may, in part, be due to the general nature of horizontal standards which restricts the use of acceptance criteria and introduces uncertainty into the evaluation process. This is borne out by experience gained from the marketplace which shows that Standard-based conformity data and its subsequent safety assessment cannot consistently guarantee safe and weal-performing products, although the uncertainty is currently being addressed by means of risk analysis, a draft Standard, prEN1441, for which is under development. Thus there is a clear requirement for the future development of specific test methods focused on end-use application and performance criteria.
|